Liberty Steamboat Co. v. Turner

64 F. 496, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2513
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1894
DocketNos. 115-118
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 64 F. 496 (Liberty Steamboat Co. v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liberty Steamboat Co. v. Turner, 64 F. 496, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2513 (2d Cir. 1894).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from four decrees of the district court, Southern district of New York, sustaining maritime liens for repairs and supplies furnished to the steamer Havana by the respective libelants. The claimant assigns as error that the Havana was in her home port when the repairs and supplies were furnished, and that they were furnished on the orders of the owner, and not on the credit of the vessel. It appears that the steamer was owned by the Liberty Steamboat Company, a New Jersey corporation. It is well settled, therefore, under the authorities, that when in New York, although enrolled there, she was in a foreign port, the residence of a corporation being the state which has incorporated it, although the individual stockholders may reside elsewhere. The Plymouth Rock, 18 Blatchf. 505, Fed. Cas. No. 11,237. Upon an examination of the record on appeal and the new proofs taken in this court- we concur in the opinion of the district judge that the several libelants relied upon the credit of the vessel, and that Schrader, who ordered the repairs and supplies, was practically the master, exercising all the ordinary functions of that office except the actual navigation of the ship, which was in charge of Pertaen, who, although described as master, seems in fact to have been but the pilot. The repairs and supplies were necessary to the vessel, were furnished to her in a foreign port, and, in the absence of satisfactory proof of an agreement between libelants and owner that the owner should be exclusively liable for payment, they are liens on the vessel. The several decrees are affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Steamer Supply Company v. the SS Tradewind
153 F. Supp. 354 (D. Maryland, 1957)
McQuade v. Compania De Vapores San Antonio, S. A.
131 F. Supp. 365 (S.D. New York, 1955)
The Western Wave
6 F. Supp. 911 (E.D. Louisiana, 1934)
The Lincoln Land
295 F. 358 (D. Massachusetts, 1923)
The Poznan
297 F. 345 (S.D. New York, 1923)
United States v. Henderson
286 F. 794 (Third Circuit, 1922)
The Bronx
246 F. 809 (Second Circuit, 1917)
The Golden Rod
151 F. 6 (Second Circuit, 1907)
The New Brunswick
129 F. 893 (First Circuit, 1904)
The New Brunswick
125 F. 567 (D. Massachusetts, 1903)
International Nav. Co. v. Lindstrom
123 F. 475 (Second Circuit, 1903)
Prince v. Ogdensburg Transit Co.
107 F. 978 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 F. 496, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberty-steamboat-co-v-turner-ca2-1894.