Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Mohabir

68 A.D.3d 435, 888 N.Y.2d 881
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 3, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Supreme Court correctly determined that petitioner presented a prima facie case that additional respondent Singh’s vehicle was involved in the accident, which, in view of Singh’s sworn denial of involvement, raises a genuine triable issue of fact justifying a stay pending a framed-issue hearing to determine whether the offending vehicle was his (see Matter of AIU Ins. Co. v Cabreja, 301 AD2d 448 [2003]; cf. Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. [Reid], 34 AD3d 333 [2006]). Concur— Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Mohabir, 68 A.D.3d 435, 888 N.Y.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 435 (Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Mohabir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Howell
2017 NY Slip Op 4406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)