In re New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance
This text of 34 A.D.3d 333 (In re New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered July 6, 2005, which denied the petition to stay arbitration of respondents’ uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
There was no genuine triable issue of fact justifying a stay. Neither the police report nor respondents identify the offending vehicle. Moreover, the insurance activity expansion report provided by petitioner failed to establish a preliminary issue that would justify a stay (cf. Matter of AIU Ins. Co. v Cabreja, 301 AD2d 448 [2003]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A.D.3d 333, 825 N.Y.S.2d 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-new-york-central-mutual-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-2006.