In re New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance

34 A.D.3d 333, 825 N.Y.S.2d 448
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 A.D.3d 333 (In re New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance, 34 A.D.3d 333, 825 N.Y.S.2d 448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered July 6, 2005, which denied the petition to stay arbitration of respondents’ uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There was no genuine triable issue of fact justifying a stay. Neither the police report nor respondents identify the offending vehicle. Moreover, the insurance activity expansion report provided by petitioner failed to establish a preliminary issue that would justify a stay (cf. Matter of AIU Ins. Co. v Cabreja, 301 AD2d 448 [2003]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Mohabir
68 A.D.3d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.3d 333, 825 N.Y.S.2d 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-new-york-central-mutual-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-2006.