Liberatore v. Liberatore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liberatore v. Liberatore

97 A.D.3d 821, 948 N.Y.2d 565

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 25, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 A.D.3d 821 (Liberatore v. Liberatore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liberatore v. Liberatore, 97 A.D.3d 821, 948 N.Y.2d 565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Since, at the time the mother filed her objections, there was no “final order” of a Support Magistrate determining the mother’s petition for a downward modification of child support, her objections were premature (Family Ct Act § 439 [e]). To the [822]*822extent that the mother challenges earlier child support orders, her objections were untimely (see Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639 [2007]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Since, at the time the mother filed her objections, there was no “final order” of a Support Magistrate determining the mother’s petition for a downward modification of child support, her objections were premature (Family Ct Act § 439 [e]). To the [822]*822extent that the mother challenges earlier child support orders, her objections were untimely (see Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639 [2007]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A.D.3d 821, 948 N.Y.2d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liberatore-v-liberatore-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack