Liberatore v. Liberatore
97 A.D.3d 821, 948 N.Y.2d 565
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Since, at the time the mother filed her objections, there was no “final order” of a Support Magistrate determining the mother’s petition for a downward modification of child support, her objections were premature (Family Ct Act § 439 [e]). To the [822]*822extent that the mother challenges earlier child support orders, her objections were untimely (see Matter of Hodges v Hodges, 40 AD3d 639 [2007]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Liberatore v. Liberatore, 97 A.D.3d 821, 948 N.Y.2d 565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
97 A.D.3d 821 (Liberatore v. Liberatore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Coscia v. Town of Greenburgh
2023 NY Slip Op 05729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)