Libbey v. Davis
This text of 34 A. 744 (Libbey v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“ Every person is entitled to five hundred dollars worth of his homestead, or of his interest therein, as a homestead right.” P. S., c. 138, s. 1. A right to receive a conveyance by virtue of a contract is an interest in land upon which creditors may levy, and which.may be subject to a homestead right. P. S., c. 220, s. 8. The defendant’s payment to Eaton of the amount due on the bond (P. S., c. 220, s. 8) is immaterial. It could not deprive the plaintiffs of, or affect their right to, a homestead. To entitle one to a homestead right it is not essential that he actually dwell on the land in which it is claimed. Upon the evidence, it was competent for the court to find that the Eaton farm was actually and conveniently used by the plaintiffs in connection with the house where they lived, and was necessary ,to the convenient enjoyment of the house by them as a home. Buxton v. Dearborn, 46 N. H. 43, 44, 45; Cole v. Bank, 59 N. H. 53, 321; Nichols v. Nichols, 62 N. H. 621; Rogers v. Bank, 63 N. H. 428.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A. 744, 68 N.H. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/libbey-v-davis-nh-1895.