Cole v. Laconia Savings Bank
59 N.H. 53
Opinion
Upon the facts stated, the bill should be dismissed. The case does not show occupation, use, or intention. It does not appear that the premises are a part of the place of the plaintiffs’ home.
Gase discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cole v. Laconia Savings Bank, 59 N.H. 53 (N.H. 1879).
59 N.H. 53 (Cole v. Laconia Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Myers
323 B.R. 11 (D. New Hampshire, 2005)
Libbey v. Davis
34 A. 744 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1895)
Nichols v. Nichols
62 N.H. 621 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1883)