Cole v. Laconia Savings Bank

59 N.H. 53
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1879·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

Upon the facts stated, the bill should be dismissed. The case does not show occupation, use, or intention. It does not appear that the premises are a part of the place of the plaintiffs’ home.

Gase discharged.

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. Laconia Savings Bank, 59 N.H. 53 (N.H. 1879).

59 N.H. 53 (Cole v. Laconia Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Myers
323 B.R. 11 (D. New Hampshire, 2005)
Libbey v. Davis
34 A. 744 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1895)
Nichols v. Nichols
62 N.H. 621 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1883)