L.H. v. County of Livingston
This text of 590 F. App'x 102 (L.H. v. County of Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant Lindsay P. Quintilone, a former prosecutor, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Telesca, J.), denying (in part) her motion to dismiss on grounds of absolute and qualified immunity. See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 524-30, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
As the district court held, defendant’s absolute immunity argument is foreclosed by Hill v. City of New York, 45 F.3d 653 (2d Cir.1995), in which we denied absolute immunity to a state prosecutor on facts that are materially the same.
The claim for qualified immunity was abandoned, for unknown reasons, in Quin-tilone’s reply brief (“[f]or purposes of this appeal only”). So we will not consider it at this time. Of course, she may renew the defense before the district court at a later stage (and, if necessary, may seek further appellate review, see Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299, 305-11, 116 S.Ct. 834, 133 L.Ed.2d 773 (1996)).
For the foregoing reasons, and finding no merit in defendant’s other arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the order of the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
590 F. App'x 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lh-v-county-of-livingston-ca2-2015.