Lezcano v. Estate of Hidalgo

88 So. 3d 306, 2012 WL 1414826, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6388
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 2012·No. No. 3D11-714·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SHEPHERD, J.

Mercedes Lezcano appeals an order of the probate court, removing her as personal representative of the estate and co-trustee of the trust of her deceased brother pursuant to a generalized order instructing her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt for a purported failure, in her capacity as personal representative, to comply with “[certain] orders [of the court]” and “failing to place all income and assets into [a] restricted depository” and related alleged misdeeds. “Because [the] removals were] ordered without notice or an evidentiary hearing, ‘the ruling did not meet even the most rudimentary requirements of due process.’ ” Zulon v. Peckins, 81 So.3d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (quoting LoCascio v. Estate of LoCascio, 78 So.3d 573, 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)). We reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate Lezcano as personal representative of the estate and co-trustee of the trust, and discharge Mr. Mendez as curator of the estate.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lezcano v. Estate of Hidalgo, 88 So. 3d 306, 2012 WL 1414826, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6388 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

88 So. 3d 306 (Lezcano v. Estate of Hidalgo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sophia Maestrales v. Peter Maestrales
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Blechman v. Dely
138 So. 3d 1110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Lezcano v. Estate of Hidalgo
100 So. 3d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)