Lexington Insurance v. Rowland
746 S.E.2d 924, 323 Ga. App. 191, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2656, 2013 WL 3988668, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 702
Opinions
In this case, the following circumstances exist and are dispositive of the appeal:
(1) The evidence supports the judgment;
(2) No reversible error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value;
(3) The judgment of the court below adequately explains the decision; and
(4) The issues are controlled adversely to the appellant for the reasons and authority given in the appellees’ brief.
The judgment of the court below therefore is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lexington Insurance v. Rowland, 746 S.E.2d 924, 323 Ga. App. 191, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2656, 2013 WL 3988668, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 702 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).
746 S.E.2d 924 (Lexington Insurance v. Rowland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Mills Plumbing Co.
263 S.E.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
General Electric Credit Corp. v. Home Indemnity Co.
309 S.E.2d 152 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. Connors
722 S.E.2d 370 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)