Lexington Insurance v. Rowland
This text of 746 S.E.2d 924 (Lexington Insurance v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this case, the following circumstances exist and are dispositive of the appeal:
(1) The evidence supports the judgment;
(2) No reversible error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value;
(3) The judgment of the court below adequately explains the decision; and
(4) The issues are controlled adversely to the appellant for the reasons and authority given in the appellees’ brief.
The judgment of the court below therefore is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
746 S.E.2d 924, 323 Ga. App. 191, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2656, 2013 WL 3988668, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lexington-insurance-v-rowland-gactapp-2013.