Lexington Colorado Auto Co. v. Grigsby

231 P. 160, 76 Colo. 328, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 536
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedDecember 1, 1924
DocketNo. 11,102.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 231 P. 160 (Lexington Colorado Auto Co. v. Grigsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lexington Colorado Auto Co. v. Grigsby, 231 P. 160, 76 Colo. 328, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 536 (Colo. 1924).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Teller

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error, plaintiff below, held a note secured by a deed of trust on land which at the time the action was begun, belonged to the plaintiff in error. A small house on the land having been blown down, the plaintiff in error sold the wreckage and it was removed from the land. The action was to recover the value of the material sold or removed, which was alleged to constitute a part of the security for the note. A trial to the court resulted in a finding and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $115.00. Defendant brings error, and asks for a supersedeas.

The principal error argued is that the court erred in *329 finding the value of the material sold, instead of the difference in value of the property with the material on it, and its value after the material had been removed.

The record shows that both parties proceeded upon the theory that the action was for the value of the lumber, or of the wrecked house, as it was when sold by defendant. The question now raised, not having been before the trial court, cannot be considered here.

We find nothing in the objections to the admission, or to the exclusion of evidence, which requires serious consideration.

The supersedeas is denied and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Allen and Mr. Justice Burke concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wickland v. Snyder
565 P.2d 976 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1977)
Colorado Investment & Realty Co. v. Riverview Drainage District
266 P. 501 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 P. 160, 76 Colo. 328, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lexington-colorado-auto-co-v-grigsby-colo-1924.