Lewis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Lewis v. State

1973 OK CR 207, 509 P.2d 181, 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 716

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 13, 1973

DocketNo. A-17808

StatusPublished

This text of 1973 OK CR 207 (Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewis v. State, 1973 OK CR 207, 509 P.2d 181, 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 716 (Okla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Appellant, Edward Juill Lewis, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged and tried in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-72-150, for the offense of Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon with Intent to Kill, he was found guilty of the lesser offense of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon, his punishment was fixed at one (1) year imprisonment and from said judgment and sentence an appeal has been perfected to this Court.

This cause was lodged in this Court on October 11, 1972. Defendant’s brief was due to be filed by November 14, 1972. However, an extension of time was granted giving defendant until January 15, 1973, to file brief. No brief was filed nor was a further extension for time in which to file brief requested. Thereafter on April 5, 1973, by order of this Court, the cause was Summarily Submitted for opinion in accordance with the rules of this Court. We have consistently held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, and no briefs are filed in support of the Petition in Error, this Court will examine the record only for fundamental error. If none appears on record, the judgment and sentence will be affirmed. Enoch v. Oklahoma City, Okl.Cr., 444 P.2d 856 (1968). We have carefully examined the record and the Petition in Error and find no fundamental error. There being no apparent error in the record on appeal, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

BLISS, P. J., concurs. BRETT, J., concurs in results.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Appellant, Edward Juill Lewis, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged and tried in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-72-150, for the offense of Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon with Intent to Kill, he was found guilty of the lesser offense of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon, his punishment was fixed at one (1) year imprisonment and from said judgment and sentence an appeal has been perfected to this Court.

This cause was lodged in this Court on October 11, 1972. Defendant’s brief was due to be filed by November 14, 1972. However, an extension of time was granted giving defendant until January 15, 1973, to file brief. No brief was filed nor was a further extension for time in which to file brief requested. Thereafter on April 5, 1973, by order of this Court, the cause was Summarily Submitted for opinion in accordance with the rules of this Court. We have consistently held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, and no briefs are filed in support of the Petition in Error, this Court will examine the record only for fundamental error. If none appears on record, the judgment and sentence will be affirmed. Enoch v. Oklahoma City, Okl.Cr., 444 P.2d 856 (1968). We have carefully examined the record and the Petition in Error and find no fundamental error. There being no apparent error in the record on appeal, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

BLISS, P. J., concurs. BRETT, J., concurs in results.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1973 OK CR 207, 509 P.2d 181, 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-state-oklacrimapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack