Enoch v. Oklahoma City

1968 OK CR 168, 444 P.2d 856, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 400
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 4, 1968
DocketA-14517
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 1968 OK CR 168 (Enoch v. Oklahoma City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Enoch v. Oklahoma City, 1968 OK CR 168, 444 P.2d 856, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 400 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

BUSSEY, Judge:

John Dale Enoch was charged, tried, and convicted in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Oklahoma City, for the crime of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor, and his punishment fixed at thirty (30) days in the city jail. From that judgment and sentence he has appealed to this Court.

This cause was lodged in this Court on November 14, 1967. Brief was due to be filed by December 4, 1967; however, no brief was filed, nor an extension .of time in which to file a brief requested. Therefore, on December 28, 1967, by order of this Court, the cause was summarily submitted for opinion in accordance with Rules Six and Nine of this Court.

This Court has repeatedly held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed in support of the petition in error, this Court will examine the records only for fundamental error. If none appears of record, the judgment will be affirmed. See Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 424 P.2d 1003.

This Court has carefully examined the record and reviewed the testimony in the instant case and finds no fundamental error. The record discloses that the defendant was afforded a fair and impartial trial and the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. There being no apparent error in the record on appeal, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence be affirmed.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gomez v. State
2007 OK CR 33 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2007)
Dunford v. State
1973 OK CR 408 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Goodnight v. State
1973 OK CR 376 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Speegle v. State
1973 OK CR 368 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Post v. State
1973 OK CR 362 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Baker v. State
1973 OK CR 346 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Brown v. State
1973 OK CR 319 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Tilley v. State
1973 OK CR 259 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Lewis v. State
1973 OK CR 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Holt v. State
1973 OK CR 202 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Elliott v. State
1972 OK CR 309 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1972)
Lee v. State
1972 OK CR 247 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1972)
Patten v. City of Tulsa
1972 OK CR 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1972)
Chasteen v. State
1972 OK CR 187 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1972)
Hendricks v. State
1972 OK CR 123 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1972)
Landsberger v. State
1971 OK CR 530 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1971)
Cassell v. State
1971 OK CR 417 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1971)
Custer v. City of Oklahoma City
1971 OK CR 79 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1968 OK CR 168, 444 P.2d 856, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enoch-v-oklahoma-city-oklacrimapp-1968.