Lewis v. State

928 So. 2d 385, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4949, 2006 WL 861313
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 874 So. 2d 18
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 2006·No. No. 3D05-2114·Published

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

Stacii Dazjwain Lewis challenges a denial of his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We find that the trial court improperly summarily denied the motion, and we reverse. On April 19, 2005, Lewis filed a motion for postconviction relief raising a number of issues. The court denied the Lewis’s motion for postconviction relief, concluding that the motion was stricken as successive. This is, of course, a proper basis under Rule 3.850 for the denial of such a motion, provided that “the prior determination was on the merits.” See Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.850. In the instant case, however the record does not support the conclusion that a prior motion had been filed or that a determination on the merits had been made. We, therefore, reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing or, if the court denies the motion without hearing, attach to its order of denial portions of the record below conclusively establishing that the appellant is not entitled to relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. State, 928 So. 2d 385, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4949, 2006 WL 861313 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

928 So. 2d 385 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.