Lewis v. State
868 So. 2d 678, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4494, 2004 WL 625766
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 817 So. 2d 933 →
Opinion
We reject the sole claim of trial error, that the prosecutor’s (mostly unobjected to) final argument requires reversal. As to the sentence, we affirm on the authority of State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla.2003). Conflict is certified with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. State, 868 So. 2d 678, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4494, 2004 WL 625766 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
868 So. 2d 678 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)