Lewis v. State

550 So. 2d 553, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5992, 1989 WL 125981
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 545 So. 2d 427
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1989·No. No. 88-1050·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

We reverse and remand for a new trial in regard to appellant’s first point concerning the trial court’s application of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.250. See Andino v. State, 547 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We find no merit in appellant’s re[554]*554maining arguments, concerning the admissibility of a taped telephonic conversation and entrapment.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. State, 550 So. 2d 553, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2524, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5992, 1989 WL 125981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 553 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andino v. State
547 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)