Lewis v. State
545 So. 2d 963, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1587, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3661, 1989 WL 72101
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 530 So. 2d 449 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for uttering a forged instrument and grand theft. It does appear, however, that the trial court assessed court costs of $250.00 without prior notice or hearing. We therefore strike the court cost provision, without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition. See, e.g., Bowen v. State, 537 So.2d 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. State, 545 So. 2d 963, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1587, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3661, 1989 WL 72101 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
545 So. 2d 963 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowen v. State
537 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)