Lewis v. Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint

455 S.E.2d 588, 265 Ga. 349
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 10, 1995·No. S95A0489·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Thomas G. Lewis filed a petition for writ of mandamus against a law firm, two judges, and a sheriff seeking damages and a ruling to compel them to vacate his June 1994 convictions for simple battery and obstruction of an officer. As an extraordinary remedy, mandamus [350]*350may issue to compel the performance of official duties only when “there is no other specific legal remedy.” OCGA § 9-6-20. Mandamus may not be used to reverse a criminal conviction, assert a tort claim, or sue a private law firm. See OCGA § 5-6-33 (a) (criminal defendants have the right to appeal a judgment); OCGA § 51-1-6 (injured persons may recover damages in tort action for breach of a legal duty); OCGA § 9-6-21 (a) (mandamus not a private remedy). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Lewis’ petition.

Decided April 10, 1995. Thomas G. Lewis, pro se. Gregory K. Hecht, Donald M. Comer, Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, Charles L. Schreeder III, Debra A. Wilson, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis v. Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, 455 S.E.2d 588, 265 Ga. 349 (Ga. 1995).

455 S.E.2d 588 (Lewis v. Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 5-6-33
Georgia § 5-6-33(a)
§ 51-1-6
Georgia § 51-1-6
§ 9-6-20
Georgia § 9-6-20
§ 9-6-21
Georgia § 9-6-21(a)