Lewis v. Newburgh Nissan Car Dealership
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
REGINA LEWIS, Plaintiff, : -against- 04 Civ. 562 (LGS) NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. CORP., ORDER Defendants. :
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, the Order dated November 6, 2020, directed pro se Plaintiff to submit a declaration setting forth good cause why this Court should not bar Plaintiff from filing any further documents in this case except for those captioned for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “Second Circuit”). See Dkt. No. 114. WHEREAS, per the Order dated December 9, 2020, Plaintiff's deadline to show cause why the Court should not impose an injunction in this case, was extended to January 8, 2021. Plaintiff was advised that if she failed to submit a declaration within the time directed, Plaintiff would be barred from filing any further documents in this case except for those captioned for the Second Circuit. See Dkt. No. 115. The Clerk of Court mailed the Orders at Dkt. Nos. 114 and 115 to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff did not timely file any declaration. It is hereby ORDERED that because Plaintiff does not show cause why the Court should not impose an injunction, she is barred from filing any further documents in this case except for those captioned for the Second Circuit. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- 45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff. Dated: January 19, 2021 A A bot New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. Newburgh Nissan Car Dealership (Lewis v. Newburgh Nissan Car Dealership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.