Lewis v. Fidelio
This text of 266 A.D.2d 357 (Lewis v. Fidelio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered January 12, 1998, as, upon granting reargument of the defendants’ prior motion for summary judgment, which was denied by order entered November 5, 1997, adhered to the original determination.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In opposition to the defendants’ motion, the plaintiff submitted a physician’s affidavit indicating that, as a result of the accident, the plaintiff sustained a serious injury. The physician stated that the plaintiff sustained “disc damage, without herniation, at L 3-L 4 and L 5-SI”, resulting in back pain which “is most severe with prolonged sitting which, unfortunately, he has to do extensively because of his occupation as a police officer”. This established that there is an issue of fact as to [358]*358whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756; Bocci v Turkowitz, 255 AD2d 476). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D.2d 357, 698 N.Y.S.2d 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-fidelio-nyappdiv-1999.