Lewallen v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

2014 Ark. App. 15
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 8, 2014
DocketCV-13-627
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 15 (Lewallen v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewallen v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2014 Ark. App. 15 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 15

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-13-627

Opinion Delivered January 8, 2014

FARON LEWALLEN APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, APPELLANT FORT SMITH DISTRICT [JV-2011-587] V. HONORABLE JIM D. SPEARS, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF JUDGE HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR CHILD AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEES WITHDRAW GRANTED

RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge

This is a no-merit appeal from an order terminating Faron Lewallen’s parental

rights to his child, B.L. Lewallen’s appellate counsel has filed a brief and motion to

withdraw under Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131,

194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-9(i) (2013). Lewallen was given an

opportunity to file pro se points but has declined to do so. We affirm and grant

counsel’s motion because there is no meritorious basis for an appeal.

B.L. entered the Department of Human Services’s custody after Lewallen

was driving drunk with B.L. in the car. The juvenile court established Lewallen’s

paternity and adjudicated B.L. dependent-neglected. B.L.’s mother consented to Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 15

the termination of her parental rights, and the court held a termination hearing

regarding Lewallen’s parental rights 19 months after B.L. came into care. There, it

was established that Lewallen was a sex offender, was homeless, had no income,

and had failed to admit that he had a drinking problem. Accordingly, the court

terminated his parental rights.

Counsel has complied with our requirements for no-merit termination cases.

The brief addresses the adverse rulings and termination order and adequately

explains why there is no arguable basis to appeal these decisions. After examining

the record we agree that an appeal would be meritless. We therefore affirm by

memorandum opinion, In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d

63 (1985), and grant the motion to withdraw.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

HARRISON and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

Deborah R. Sallings, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
194 S.W.3d 739 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)
In Re Memorandum Opinions
700 S.W.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewallen-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2014.