Lewallen v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
This text of 2014 Ark. App. 15 (Lewallen v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 15
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-13-627
Opinion Delivered January 8, 2014
FARON LEWALLEN APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, APPELLANT FORT SMITH DISTRICT [JV-2011-587] V. HONORABLE JIM D. SPEARS, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF JUDGE HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR CHILD AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPELLEES WITHDRAW GRANTED
RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge
This is a no-merit appeal from an order terminating Faron Lewallen’s parental
rights to his child, B.L. Lewallen’s appellate counsel has filed a brief and motion to
withdraw under Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131,
194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-9(i) (2013). Lewallen was given an
opportunity to file pro se points but has declined to do so. We affirm and grant
counsel’s motion because there is no meritorious basis for an appeal.
B.L. entered the Department of Human Services’s custody after Lewallen
was driving drunk with B.L. in the car. The juvenile court established Lewallen’s
paternity and adjudicated B.L. dependent-neglected. B.L.’s mother consented to Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 15
the termination of her parental rights, and the court held a termination hearing
regarding Lewallen’s parental rights 19 months after B.L. came into care. There, it
was established that Lewallen was a sex offender, was homeless, had no income,
and had failed to admit that he had a drinking problem. Accordingly, the court
terminated his parental rights.
Counsel has complied with our requirements for no-merit termination cases.
The brief addresses the adverse rulings and termination order and adequately
explains why there is no arguable basis to appeal these decisions. After examining
the record we agree that an appeal would be meritless. We therefore affirm by
memorandum opinion, In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d
63 (1985), and grant the motion to withdraw.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
HARRISON and GRUBER, JJ., agree.
Deborah R. Sallings, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. App. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewallen-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2014.