Levisohn v. Waganer

76 Ala. 412
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 76 Ala. 412 (Levisohn v. Waganer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levisohn v. Waganer, 76 Ala. 412 (Ala. 1884).

Opinion

SOMERYILLE, J.

— The judgment against the garnishee is clearly erroneous, and must be reversed. His answer showed that he was neither indebted to the defendant, Fox, nor had under his control any chattels such as the statute authorizes to be condemned. The choses in action which were in his possession could not be the subject of condemnation in such a proceeding, and the garnishee was entitled to be discharged on his answer. This has long been declared to be the settled law in this State. — Jones v. Norris, 2 Ala. 526; Jones v. Crew, 64 Ala. 368; Code, 1876, §§ 3293-3295, 3268; Drake on Attachments, § 481.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cottingham v. Greely Barnham Grocery Co.
129 Ala. 200 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)
Craft & Co. v. Summersell
93 Ala. 430 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Teague, Barnett & Co. v. LeGrand
85 Ala. 493 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)
Hurst, Purnell & Co. v. Home Protection Fire Insurance
81 Ala. 174 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1886)
Edwards v. Levinshon
80 Ala. 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Ala. 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levisohn-v-waganer-ala-1884.