Levining v. State

13 Ga. 513
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1853
DocketNo. 77
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 13 Ga. 513 (Levining v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levining v. State, 13 Ga. 513 (Ga. 1853).

Opinion

By the Court.

Starnes, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] We see no good reason in the record why we should depart from that sound and settled rule, that a new trial -will not be granted on the ground of newly discovered testimony, [515]*515if the only object of the evidence he to impeach the credit or character of a witness.

. Numerous decisions in England and in this country, avouch this as a correct and wholesome rule., This Court has affirmed it in the case of Berry vs. The State of Georgia, (10 Cfa. JR,. 511,) where many of the cases-referred to are cited, and should not now disturb it, though the case presented involves the individual hardship so feelingly depicted by the counsel.

[2.] If it be true, that an innocent man has been convicted upon- false testimony, and witnesses have since been discovered, who can prove that testimony false, the victim is not without a remedy, potent to break his bonds, and free his character from stain.

Such a case presented to the Executive, will, without doubt, successfully appeal to the power with which the Constitution clothes that officer, and speedily invoke that pardoning clemency for the sufferer, w'hich, whilst it carries with it a remedy for his wrongs, will insure justice to his character and memory.

It is better that to this efficient tribunal we should commend such a case of individual hardship, than by granting a new trial, violate one of those general rules, so essential to the pure and certain administration of justice.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Veasey v. State
119 S.E.2d 346 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Johnson v. State
27 S.E.2d 749 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Humphrey v. State
147 S.E. 402 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Newark Fire Insurance v. Reese
139 S.E. 158 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Burnett v. State
137 S.E. 796 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Waller v. State
131 S.E. 95 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Reese v. State
116 S.E. 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Boney v. State
115 S.E. 279 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Norwood v. State
111 S.E. 59 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Story v. State
110 S.E. 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Fountain v. State
107 S.E. 360 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Byers v. State
100 S.E. 20 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Key v. State
95 S.E. 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Haynes v. State
90 S.E. 485 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Wright v. Georgia
34 Ga. 110 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ga. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levining-v-state-ga-1853.