Levine v. Levine
This text of 29 So. 3d 464 (Levine v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This appeal and cross-appeal arises from the trial court’s Order on Remand entered pursuant to this court’s decision in Levine v. Levine, 964 So.2d 741 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We affirm the trial court’s order in all respects without discussion except for the issue of accounting for income from the marital home which the former wife, Loren Levine, received as part of the equitable distribution of the parties’ marital assets.
The former wife presently lives in the marital home with her children. The trial [465]*465court correctly determined that income cannot reasonably be imputed from this asset at this time. However, should this asset become income-producing in the future, the former husband is not precluded from seeking modification of his alimony obligation.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 So. 3d 464, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3333, 2010 WL 934067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-levine-fladistctapp-2010.