Levine v. Amber Manufacturing Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Levine v. Amber Manufacturing Corp.

397 N.E.2d 345, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 939

DecidedDecember 4, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 397 N.E.2d 345 (Levine v. Amber Manufacturing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levine v. Amber Manufacturing Corp., 397 N.E.2d 345, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 939 (Mass. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Compliance with the specific directive of our earlier mandate (6 Mass. App. Ct. 840 [1978]) requires that the interest component of the judgment after rescript be modified (following an evidentiary hearing if necessary) so as to equal the sum of the individual monthly interest payments which were called for under the express provisions of the composition of July 26, 1973, with the interest on each minimum required monthly payment of indebtedness being calculated at the variable but specifically ascertainable rate set out in the composition for each monthly period from the date each such payment of indebtedness was due up to and including the date of the entry of the judgment after rescript. That judgment, as so modified, is affirmed; the plaintiff’s requests under G. L. c. 211A, § 15, under G. L. c. 231, § 6F, and under Rule 1:28 of the Appeals Court, as amended (6 Mass. App. Ct. 982 [1978]), are all denied; costs of this appeal are not to be awarded to any party.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Compliance with the specific directive of our earlier mandate (6 Mass. App. Ct. 840 [1978]) requires that the interest component of the judgment after rescript be modified (following an evidentiary hearing if necessary) so as to equal the sum of the individual monthly interest payments which were called for under the express provisions of the composition of July 26, 1973, with the interest on each minimum required monthly payment of indebtedness being calculated at the variable but specifically ascertainable rate set out in the composition for each monthly period from the date each such payment of indebtedness was due up to and including the date of the entry of the judgment after rescript. That judgment, as so modified, is affirmed; the plaintiff’s requests under G. L. c. 211A, § 15, under G. L. c. 231, § 6F, and under Rule 1:28 of the Appeals Court, as amended (6 Mass. App. Ct. 982 [1978]), are all denied; costs of this appeal are not to be awarded to any party.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 N.E.2d 345, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-amber-manufacturing-corp-massappct-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack