Lester v. State

529 So. 2d 1166, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1530, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2811
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lester v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 563 So. 2d 178
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1988·No. No. 87-1007·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The orders permanently committing appellant's two children are affirmed. We write only to note that appellee’s brief, although reflecting considerable care and expertise in preparation, is marred by the failure to respond to the points on appeal as stated by appellant. Although the inconvenience to the court was only minor in this case, our review would have been simplified had the appellee’s brief proceeded to respond to appellant’s arguments in a more orderly fashion. See Morris, Oral Arguments and Written Briefs — DCA Judges Comment, 62 Fla.Bar 23, 24 (May 1988).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester v. State, 529 So. 2d 1166, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1530, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2811 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

529 So. 2d 1166 (Lester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.