Lester v. State
532 So. 2d 63, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2329, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4495, 1988 WL 105197
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1988·No. No. 87-1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the imposition of court costs which were assessed without notice or an opportunity to be heard are quashed. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988). On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the court may reconsider the imposition of costs.
CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS QUASHED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lester v. State, 532 So. 2d 63, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2329, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4495, 1988 WL 105197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
532 So. 2d 63 (Lester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Akana v. State
541 So. 2d 1364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
White v. State
539 So. 2d 1190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)