Akana v. State
541 So. 2d 1364, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1989 WL 41194
Opinion
The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the imposition of court costs which were assessed without notice or an opportunity to be heard are quashed. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Lester v. State, 532 So.2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Singletary v. State, 530 So.2d 460 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the court may reconsider the imposition of costs.
CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS QUASHED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akana v. State, 541 So. 2d 1364, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1989 WL 41194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
541 So. 2d 1364 (Akana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singletary v. State
530 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Harriel v. State
520 So. 2d 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Shipley v. State
528 So. 2d 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Lester v. State
532 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)