Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Akana v. State

Akana v. State

541 So. 2d 1364, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1989 WL 41194
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1245
StatusPublished

This text of 541 So. 2d 1364 (Akana v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akana v. State, 541 So. 2d 1364, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1989 WL 41194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

ORFINGER, Judge.

The appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the imposition of court costs which were assessed without notice or an opportunity to be heard are quashed. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Lester v. State, 532 So.2d 63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Singletary v. State, 530 So.2d 460 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). On remand, after proper notice and hearing, the court may reconsider the imposition of costs.

CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; COSTS QUASHED.

COBB and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Singletary v. State
530 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Harriel v. State
520 So. 2d 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Shipley v. State
528 So. 2d 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Lester v. State
532 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 So. 2d 1364, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1044, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2168, 1989 WL 41194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akana-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.