Lester v. City of St. Petersburg

Supreme Court of Florida

Lester v. City of St. Petersburg

190 So. 2d 307, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3289

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 14, 1966

DocketNo. 35214

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 190 So. 2d 307 (Lester v. City of St. Petersburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lester v. City of St. Petersburg, 190 So. 2d 307, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3289 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before this Court upon a petition for writ of certiorari and a notice of interlocutory appeal both directed to a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, filed January 26, 1966 (183 So.2d 589). The Court has this day entered its order denying the petition for certiorari and, in connection with the consideration of the jurisdictional power of this Court to entertain said writ of cer-tiorari, it has re-examined the record in the interlocutory appeal and has sua sponte reconsidered its order of May 2nd, 1966 denying the motion of appellee City of St. Petersburg to dismiss the appeal .and, upon such reconsideration, finds that this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the interlocutory appeal herein under Section 4(2), Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Thereupon, it is

Ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., concurring specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before this Court upon a petition for writ of certiorari and a notice of interlocutory appeal both directed to a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, filed January 26, 1966 (183 So.2d 589). The Court has this day entered its order denying the petition for certiorari and, in connection with the consideration of the jurisdictional power of this Court to entertain said writ of cer-tiorari, it has re-examined the record in the interlocutory appeal and has sua sponte reconsidered its order of May 2nd, 1966 denying the motion of appellee City of St. Petersburg to dismiss the appeal .and, upon such reconsideration, finds that this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the interlocutory appeal herein under Section 4(2), Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Thereupon, it is

Ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., concurring specially.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 2d 307, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-v-city-of-st-petersburg-fla-1966.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack