Lester Associates v. Commonwealth

762 A.2d 1084
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lester Associates v. Commonwealth. Read the opinion of the Court — 563 Pa. 519
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 28, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2000, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated. The Commonwealth Court erred when it relied upon Sabatine v. Commonwealth, 497 Pa. 453, 442 A.2d 210, 212 (1981), for the general proposition that the Department of Revenue is not bound by- a Common Pleas Court’s decision. Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for consideration of whether Lester Associates proffered sufficient evidence that the March 20, 1992 deed was void ab ini-tio, Sabatine, 497 Pa. at 458, 442 A.2d at 212, such that there was no transfer of real estate, justifying the imposition of realty transfer tax by the Department of Revenue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lester Associates v. Commonwealth, 762 A.2d 1084 (Pa. 2000).

762 A.2d 1084 (Lester Associates v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sabatine v. Commonwealth
442 A.2d 210 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)