Lester Associates v. Commonwealth

762 A.2d 1084
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 28, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 762 A.2d 1084 (Lester Associates v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lester Associates v. Commonwealth, 762 A.2d 1084 (Pa. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2000, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated. The Commonwealth Court erred when it relied upon Sabatine v. Commonwealth, 497 Pa. 453, 442 A.2d 210, 212 (1981), for the general proposition that the Department of Revenue is not bound by- a Common Pleas Court’s decision. Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for consideration of whether Lester Associates proffered sufficient evidence that the March 20, 1992 deed was void ab ini-tio, Sabatine, 497 Pa. at 458, 442 A.2d at 212, such that there was no transfer of real estate, justifying the imposition of realty transfer tax by the Department of Revenue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sabatine v. Commonwealth
442 A.2d 210 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 A.2d 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lester-associates-v-commonwealth-pa-2000.