Lessler v. Bernstein

65 Misc. 58, 119 N.Y.S. 197
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 Misc. 58 (Lessler v. Bernstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lessler v. Bernstein, 65 Misc. 58, 119 N.Y.S. 197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action was on contract for goods sold and delivered. The learned trial judge submitted the case to the jury as one for damages sustained by the plaintiff through the fraudulent representations of the defendant. Proper instructions in an action for fraud and misrepresentation were laid before the jury and a verdict rendered for the.plaintiff. Ho exception was taken to the charge. The court discovered the error and directed that a body execution should not issue. We are of the opinion that the judgment should not stand and that the interests of justice require a new trial.

Present: Gildersleeve, Seabury and Lehman, J J.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fehlhaber Corp. & Horn Construction Co. v. State
69 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Misc. 58, 119 N.Y.S. 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lessler-v-bernstein-nyappterm-1909.