Lesly Jean v. The City of New York; Doe

S.D. New York

Lesly Jean v. The City of New York; Doe

DecidedOctober 3, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-06302

StatusUnknown

This text of Lesly Jean v. The City of New York; Doe (Lesly Jean v. The City of New York; Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lesly Jean v. The City of New York; Doe, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LESLY JEAN, Plaintiff, 25-CV-6302 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL THE CITY OF NEW YORK; DOE, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated August 5, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed prisoner authorization or pay the $405.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed a prisoner authorization or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 3, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LESLY JEAN, Plaintiff, 25-CV-6302 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL THE CITY OF NEW YORK; DOE, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated August 5, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed prisoner authorization or pay the $405.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed a prisoner authorization or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 3, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Lesly Jean v. The City of New York; Doe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesly-jean-v-the-city-of-new-york-doe-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack