Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III
This text of Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III (Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
August 23, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano 161454(59) Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch, LESLIE J. MURPHY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 161454 v COA: 345758 Oakland CC: 2017-159571-CB SAMUEL M. INMAN, III, JOHN F. SMITH, BERNARD M. GOLDSMITH, WILLIAM O. GRABE, LAWRENCE DAVID HANSEN, ANDREAS MAI, JONATHAN YARON, and ENRICO DIGIROLAMO, Defendants-Appellees. ___________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees to extend the time for filing their supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as timely filed if submitted within 42 days of being served the plaintiff-appellant’s supplemental brief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. August 23, 2021
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leslie-j-murphy-v-samuel-m-inman-iii-mich-2021.