Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 30, 2020·No. 161454·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 161454(55) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra LESLIE J. MURPHY, Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff-Appellant, Megan K. Cavanagh, SC: 161454 Justices

v COA: 345758 Oakland CC: 2017-159571-CB SAMUEL M. INMAN, III, JOHN F. SMITH, BERNARD M. GOLDSMITH, WILLIAM O. GRABE, LAWRENCE DAVID HANSEN, ANDREAS MAI, JONATHAN YARON, and ENRICO DIGIROLAMO, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 26, 2020.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 30, 2020

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III, (Mich. 2020).

Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III (Leslie J Murphy v. Samuel M Inman III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.