Leslie Bros. v. Roope Roope

148 So. 212, 108 Fla. 289
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 14, 1933·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being-now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the' Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leslie Bros. v. Roope Roope, 148 So. 212, 108 Fla. 289 (Fla. 1933).

148 So. 212 (Leslie Bros. v. Roope Roope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rety v. Green
546 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Hargrave v. Dugger
832 F.2d 1528 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
State v. Casper
417 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux.
150 So. 804 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)