Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux.

150 So. 804, 112 Fla. 734, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2341

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 13, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to a special and extraordinary-motion filed herein on April 27, 1933, following denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing under date of April 22, 1933, the Court has again completely reconsidered and reviewed this cause, and after due consideration of all matters presented, has reached the conclusion that the opinion filed' on rehearing as reported under the style of Leslie Bros., Inc., v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 Sou. Rep. 212, should be adhered to, and that the decree appealed from, as modified on rehearing, should stand affirmed as heretofore decided, and' mandate be issued accordingly. It .is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to a special and extraordinary-motion filed herein on April 27, 1933, following denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing under date of April 22, 1933, the Court has again completely reconsidered and reviewed this cause, and after due consideration of all matters presented, has reached the conclusion that the opinion filed' on rehearing as reported under the style of Leslie Bros., Inc., v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 Sou. Rep. 212, should be adhered to, and that the decree appealed from, as modified on rehearing, should stand affirmed as heretofore decided, and' mandate be issued accordingly. It .is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux., 150 So. 804, 112 Fla. 734, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2341 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

150 So. 804 (Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related