Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux.

150 So. 804, 112 Fla. 734, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2341

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 13, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 So. 804 (Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, Et Ux., 150 So. 804, 112 Fla. 734, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2341 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to a special and extraordinary-motion filed herein on April 27, 1933, following denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing under date of April 22, 1933, the Court has again completely reconsidered and reviewed this cause, and after due consideration of all matters presented, has reached the conclusion that the opinion filed' on rehearing as reported under the style of Leslie Bros., Inc., v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 Sou. Rep. 212, should be adhered to, and that the decree appealed from, as modified on rehearing, should stand affirmed as heretofore decided, and' mandate be issued accordingly. It .is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to a special and extraordinary-motion filed herein on April 27, 1933, following denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing under date of April 22, 1933, the Court has again completely reconsidered and reviewed this cause, and after due consideration of all matters presented, has reached the conclusion that the opinion filed' on rehearing as reported under the style of Leslie Bros., Inc., v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 Sou. Rep. 212, should be adhered to, and that the decree appealed from, as modified on rehearing, should stand affirmed as heretofore decided, and' mandate be issued accordingly. It .is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 So. 804, 112 Fla. 734, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leslie-bros-inc-v-roope-et-ux-fla-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack