Lesesne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lesesne v. State

706 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2224, 1998 WL 95329

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1998

DocketNo. 97-485

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 137 (Lesesne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lesesne v. State, 706 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2224, 1998 WL 95329 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Randy Lesesne appeals the judgment and sentences imposed on his convictions for burglary of a dwelling and petit theft. We affirm the convictions but remand for correction of error apparent on the face of the judgment and sentencing documents relevant to the petit theft conviction. Upon remand, those documents must be corrected to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing.

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED with instructions.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Randy Lesesne appeals the judgment and sentences imposed on his convictions for burglary of a dwelling and petit theft. We affirm the convictions but remand for correction of error apparent on the face of the judgment and sentencing documents relevant to the petit theft conviction. Upon remand, those documents must be corrected to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing.

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED with instructions.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2224, 1998 WL 95329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lesesne-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack