Lesesne v. State
706 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2224, 1998 WL 95329
Opinion
Randy Lesesne appeals the judgment and sentences imposed on his convictions for burglary of a dwelling and petit theft. We affirm the convictions but remand for correction of error apparent on the face of the judgment and sentencing documents relevant to the petit theft conviction. Upon remand, those documents must be corrected to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing.
AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lesesne v. State, 706 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2224, 1998 WL 95329 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
706 So. 2d 137 (Lesesne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
786 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)