Lesane v. Doe 1

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 16, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-04746·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STEVEN LESANE, Plaintiff, 21-CV-4746 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE NYPD 043 PRECINCT JOHN DOE 1, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. By order dated July 26, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint, but granted Plaintiff thirty days’ leave to replead his claims. (ECF 6.) On August 23, 2021, the Court received from Plaintiff a type-written submission without a signature. (ECF 7.) Because Plaintiff’s submission appears to be an attempt to comply with the Court’s July 26, 2021 order, the Court construes the submission as an amended complaint. Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name – or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” See also Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 11(a) to require “as it did in John Hancock’s day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced).” Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001). To cure this filing deficiency, the Court directs Plaintiff to submit the attached declaration with his original signature to the Court within thirty days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED. Dated: September 16, 2021 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lesane v. Doe 1, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Lesane v. Doe 1 (Lesane v. Doe 1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Becker v. Montgomery
532 U.S. 757 (Supreme Court, 2001)