LePrince v. McLeod

Supreme Court of Florida

LePrince v. McLeod

179 So. 2d 856

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 10, 1965·No. No. 34211·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOB-SON (Ret.), JJ., and McCORD, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOB-SON (Ret.), JJ., and McCORD, Circuit Judge, concur.

LePrince v. McLeod, 179 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

179 So. 2d 856 (LePrince v. McLeod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related