LePrince v. McLeod

Supreme Court of Florida

LePrince v. McLeod

179 So. 2d 856

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 10, 1965

DocketNo. 34211

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 So. 2d 856 (LePrince v. McLeod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LePrince v. McLeod, 179 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOB-SON (Ret.), JJ., and McCORD, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOB-SON (Ret.), JJ., and McCORD, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 So. 2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leprince-v-mcleod-fla-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack