Leopold J. Gunston v. United States of America
358 F.2d 303
Opinion
The motion to augment the record by including the proceedings before the Bureau of Employees’ Compensation is denied. This court has no jurisdiction to review an action of that Bureau. Soderman v. United States Civil Service Commission, 9 Cir., 313 F.2d 694.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons and upon the grounds stated in the opinion of the District Court, Gunston v. United States et al., 235 F.Supp. 349.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leopold J. Gunston v. United States of America, 358 F.2d 303 (9th Cir. 1966).
358 F.2d 303 (Leopold J. Gunston v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment
494 A.2d 1340 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
Reynold Floyd Reep v. United States
557 F.2d 204 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Isgett v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
332 F. Supp. 1127 (D. South Carolina, 1971)