Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Leone v. Lowry Horowitz & Fischer, Inc.

Leone v. Lowry Horowitz & Fischer, Inc.

279 A.D. 804, 109 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4899
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D. 804 (Leone v. Lowry Horowitz & Fischer, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leone v. Lowry Horowitz & Fischer, Inc., 279 A.D. 804, 109 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

The accident, in which the plaintiff was injured, was allegedly brought about by a defect in the structure of the danc-e floor where she fell, and not because of a condition of a transient and possibly recent nature. It was, therefore, error to charge that there must he an affirmative finding of notice on the part of the defendant before the plaintiff could recover. (Ruddy v. Putnam Theatrical Corp., 255 App. Div. 1027.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruddy v. Putnam Theatrical Corp.
255 A.D. 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 804, 109 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leone-v-lowry-horowitz-fischer-inc-nyappdiv-1952.