Leone v. City of Utica
This text of 403 N.E.2d 964 (Leone v. City of Utica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order appealed from should be affirmed with costs, for those reasons relating to duty and proximate cause stated in the opinion of Presiding Justice Michael F. Dillon at the Appellate Division (66 AD2d 463). We note, in addition that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s belated application for permission to assert a cross claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 N.E.2d 964, 49 N.Y.2d 811, 426 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leone-v-city-of-utica-ny-1980.