Leo O. Johnson, an Individual Doing Business as Johnson Hair and Scalp Clinic v. Federal Trade Commission
266 F.2d 560
Opinions
We find no such differences in fact as distinguish this case from Mueller v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 262 F.2d 443. We adhere to the doctrines there announced. The order of the Commission is affirmed and will be enforced.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leo O. Johnson, an Individual Doing Business as Johnson Hair and Scalp Clinic v. Federal Trade Commission, 266 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1959).
266 F.2d 560 (Leo O. Johnson, an Individual Doing Business as Johnson Hair and Scalp Clinic v. Federal Trade Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keele Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
275 F.2d 18 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
George M. Voss, Trading as Voss Hair Experts of Georgia v. Federal Trade Commission
275 F.2d 24 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Leo O. Johnson, an Individual Doing Business as Johnson Hair and Scalp Clinic v. Federal Trade Commission
266 F.2d 560 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)