Leo MacHine & Tool, Inc. v. Poe Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Leo MacHine & Tool, Inc. v. Poe Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.

940 N.E.2d 384, 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 49, 2011 WL 171700

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 2011

Docket02A03-1003-PL-143

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 940 N.E.2d 384 (Leo MacHine & Tool, Inc. v. Poe Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leo MacHine & Tool, Inc. v. Poe Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., 940 N.E.2d 384, 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 49, 2011 WL 171700 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

RILEY, Judge.

Appellee, Anderson Excavating, Inc. (Anderson), has filed a petition for rehearing requesting us to reconsider our statement that "[Anderson] is not a party to this appeal." See Leo Machine & Tool, Inc. v. Poe Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc., 936 N.E.2d 855, 855 n. 1 (Ind.Ct.App.2010). We grant Anderson's petition for rehearing for the limited purpose of reviewing this statement.

We acknowledge that the court of appeals' docket reflects that Anderson filed his brief on July 23, 2010. However, upon review, we note that Anderson's appellate brief was never included in the fully transmitted case and as such, this panel did not have Anderson's brief when reviewing Leo Machine's claims.

Nevertheless, as Anderson was Poe Fire Department's agent, we affirm our opinion in full with the addition that we now also affirm the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Anderson on the same legal grounds.

KIRSCH, J., and BAILEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI