Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 2022·No. 05-22-00324-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 7, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00324-CV

LEO BIENATI, THERESA PHAM, CARLOS LACAYO AND ANDRES RUZO, Appellants

V.

CLOISTER HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17448

ORDER

We make the following orders regarding Appellants’ Motion to Review

Further Order Pursuant to Rule 29.6, Motion for Leave to File Supplemental

Appellants’ Brief, & Motion to Reset Oral Argument:

The case is REMOVED from the October 12, 2022 oral-argument docket.

The case will be reset for submission in due course.

Appellants’ request for leave to file a supplemental appellants’ brief is

GRANTED. Appellants’ supplemental brief is due twenty days after both the supplemental clerk’s record and the supplemental reporter’s record have been filed

in this Court.

It is further ORDERED that appellee may file a supplemental appellee’s

brief if appellants file a supplemental appellants’ brief. Appellee’s supplemental

brief is due twenty days after appellants file their supplemental appellants’ brief.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC (Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.