Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC
This text of Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC (Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered October 3, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-22-00324-CV
LEO BIENATI, THERESA PHAM, CARLOS LACAYO AND ANDRES RUZO, Appellants
V.
CLOISTER HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17448
ORDER
Appellee is ORDERED to file its response, if any, to Appellants’ Motion to
Review Further Order Pursuant to Rule 29.6, Motion for Leave to File
Supplemental Appellants’ Brief, & Motion to Reset Oral Argument no later than
October 6, 2022.
/s/ DENNISE GARCIA PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leo Bienati, Theresa Pham, Carlos Lacayo and Andres Ruzo v. Holy Kombucha, Inc. and Cloister Holdings, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-bienati-theresa-pham-carlos-lacayo-and-andres-ruzo-v-holy-kombucha-texapp-2022.