Lenders Capital LLC v. Ranu Realty Corp.

99 A.D.3d 566, 952 N.Y.2d 187
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 2012·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The motion court erred in finding that a stay was in effect at the time of the foreclosure sale and that the sale was a nullity. Even assuming that, about two hours before the sale took place, the referee’s office had been served with the order to show cause staying the sale, the record demonstrates that defendants failed to comply strictly with the methods of service provided for in the order to show cause and failed to present proof of service on the return date of the motion (see Kue Mee Realty Corp. v Louie, 295 AD2d 263 [1st Dept 2002]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lenders Capital LLC v. Ranu Realty Corp., 99 A.D.3d 566, 952 N.Y.2d 187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

99 A.D.3d 566 (Lenders Capital LLC v. Ranu Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co. v. Allsopp
70 Misc. 3d 139(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Deutsche Bank Trust Co. v. Bullen
2020 NY Slip Op 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Bank of New York v. Shem-Tov
109 A.D.3d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Board of Managers of Shorehaven Condominium v. Pina
107 A.D.3d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)