Bank of New York v. Shem-Tov
This text of 109 A.D.3d 857 (Bank of New York v. Shem-Tov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Yosi Shem-Tov, also known as Yosi Shemtov, also known as Yosi Shem Tov appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated April 27, 2012, as denied that branch of his motion which was to vacate a foreclosure sale on the ground that the sale was conducted in violation of a stay which had been previously imposed by an order to show cause of the same court.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant Yosi Shem-Tov, also known as Yosi Shemtov,
[858]*858also known as Yosi Shorn Tov (hereinafter the appellant), moved to vacate a foreclosure sale, inter alia, on the ground that the sale was conducted in violation of a stay which had been previously imposed by an order to show cause of the same court. However, as the Supreme Court noted, the appellant failed to show that the order to show cause staying the foreclosure sale was, as required by its terms, personally served upon the referee (see Lenders Capital LLC v Ranu Realty Corp., 99 AD3d 566 [2012]).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.
The Supreme Court therefore properly denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was to vacate the foreclosure sale. Eng, EJ., Rivera, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A.D.3d 857, 971 N.Y.S.2d 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-new-york-v-shem-tov-nyappdiv-2013.