Lenard Wallace Nolen, Sr. v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator, Veterans Administration

549 F.2d 341, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14174
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 1977
Docket76-4203
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 549 F.2d 341 (Lenard Wallace Nolen, Sr. v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator, Veterans Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lenard Wallace Nolen, Sr. v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator, Veterans Administration, 549 F.2d 341, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14174 (5th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by plaintiff Lenard Nolen from a summary judgment by the district court denying his claim that officials of the Veterans Administration have im *342 properly refused to allow him to see records kept by the Administration on him and have improperly refused to amend or correct such records. This is appellant’s third visit to this Court in an attempt to prove that he has a service-connected disability. The district court held that it had been judicially determined in the two previous proceedings that Nolen had not been denied access to the records of the Veterans Administration pertaining to him which he was entitled to inspect and copy, and that such records contain no erroneous documents, information, or agency determination. This Court affirmed those decisions. Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 5 Cir., 1976, 535 F.2d 890, and Nolen v. Rumsfeld, 5 Cir., 1976, 535 F.2d 888.

Mr. Nolen now attempts to relitigate these issues in a suit under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a et seq. The basic claims asserted here have already been decided against appellant by a court of competent jurisdiction. Mr. Nolen is collaterally es-topped from asserting those claims in the present action. See Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 5 Cir., 1976, 543 F.2d 1106; Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 5 Cir., 1975, 517 F.2d 117, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054, 96 S.Ct. 784, 46 L.Ed.2d 643; Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 5 Cir., 1975, 517 F.2d 110, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054, 96 S.Ct. 784, 46 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); IB Moore’s Federal Practice 11 0.441[2], 0.448 (2d ed. 1974). Appellant’s other contentions are without merit and require no discussion.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramos González v. Félix Medina
121 P.R. Dec. 312 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1988)
Nolen v. Roudebush
551 F.2d 863 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 F.2d 341, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 14174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lenard-wallace-nolen-sr-v-richard-l-roudebush-administrator-veterans-ca5-1977.