Leman v. Eastman

Supreme Court

Leman v. Eastman

254 U.S. 611, 41 S. Ct. 38, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1130

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 8, 1920

DocketNo. 306

StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 611 (Leman v. Eastman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leman v. Eastman, 254 U.S. 611, 41 S. Ct. 38, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1130 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Motions to dismiss submitted October 11, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505, 508; United States v. Heinze, 218 U. S. 532, 545-546; Lott v. Pittman, 243 U. S. 588, 591; Ex parte Abdu, 247 U. S. 27, 30. (2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369-370. Mr. Henry W. Leman for plaintiffs in error., Mr. Carl V. Wisner, for Eastman, defendant in error. Mr. Salmon O. Levinson, Mr. Benjamin V. Becker, Mr. Irwin T. Gilbruth and Mr. John P. Barnes, for Northern Trust Company, defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Motions to dismiss submitted October 11, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505, 508; United States v. Heinze, 218 U. S. 532, 545-546; Lott v. Pittman, 243 U. S. 588, 591; Ex parte Abdu, 247 U. S. 27, 30. (2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369-370. Mr. Henry W. Leman for plaintiffs in error., Mr. Carl V. Wisner, for Eastman, defendant in error. Mr. Salmon O. Levinson, Mr. Benjamin V. Becker, Mr. Irwin T. Gilbruth and Mr. John P. Barnes, for Northern Trust Company, defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 611, 41 S. Ct. 38, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leman-v-eastman-scotus-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack