Leman v. Eastman

254 U.S. 611, 41 S. Ct. 38, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1130
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 8, 1920·No. No. 306·Published

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Motions to dismiss submitted October 11, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505, 508; United States v. Heinze, 218 U. S. 532, 545-546; Lott v. Pittman, 243 U. S. 588, 591; Ex parte Abdu, 247 U. S. 27, 30. (2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669-670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369-370. Mr. Henry W. Leman for plaintiffs in error., Mr. Carl V. Wisner, for Eastman, defendant in error. Mr. Salmon O. Levinson, Mr. Benjamin V. Becker, Mr. Irwin T. Gilbruth and Mr. John P. Barnes, for Northern Trust Company, defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leman v. Eastman, 254 U.S. 611, 41 S. Ct. 38, 65 L. Ed. 437, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1130 (1920).

254 U.S. 611 (Leman v. Eastman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. McConnico
168 U.S. 674 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Reetz v. Michigan
188 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1903)
United States v. Heinze
218 U.S. 532 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. Missouri
224 U.S. 270 (Supreme Court, 1912)
McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.
233 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Gasquet v. Lapeyre
242 U.S. 367 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Lott v. Pittman
243 U.S. 588 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Ex Parte Abdu
247 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 1918)